|
Climate
Alarmists versus Science
By Lykke E. Andersen*,
La Paz,
11
August
2008.
It is not easy to be worried about average temperature increases
of a few degrees over the rest of your life if the temperatures
you experience change ten times as much every single day.
Consequently, much of the concern around global warming is
focused on associated
effects, such as the melting of glaciers,
sea-level rise, floods, droughts, hurricanes, an increase in the
frequency and severity of the El Niño – Southern Oscillation (ENSO),
and possible abrupt climate changes, such as the shut-down of
the thermohaline circulation (MOC) which brings warm waters and
mild
climates to northern
Europe.
The supposed simultaneous increase in floods and droughts has
always seemed a bit illogical to me, but the melting of glaciers
and the resulting increase in sea-levels seem obvious, and since
hurricanes form over warm waters, an increase in those might
also be suspected. Since El Niño events are associated with
unusually warm waters in the east Pacific ocean, these might
also increase in either frequency or intensity, whereas one
might suspect less La Niña events (cooling of the east Pacific).
Finally, the MOC is driven partly by salinity and temperature
differentials, so it is conceivable that a large release of cold
freshwater (from melting Greenland ice, for example) could
interfere with the functioning of the MOC.
But what do climate scientists have to say about the likelihood,
extent
and timing
of these expected events?
The Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) from the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) published last year provides a
comprehensive overview of peer-reviewed scientific research on
the topic, and
summarizes
the results in a language that is pretty much understandable to
non-climate scientists (1). Chapter 10
from Working Group 1 is titled “Global Climate Projections” and
is therefore a central chapter if you want to know what to
expect for the rest of the century in terms of climate.
Here are a few interesting excerpts from the Executive Summary
of Chapter 10:
“General Circulation Models indicate that the Antarctic Ice
Sheet will receive increased snowfall without experiencing
substantial surface melting, thus gaining mass and contributing
negatively to sea level.” (p.
751)
“Most recent published modelling studies investigating tropical
storm frequency simulate a decrease in the overall number of
storms.” (p.
751)
“Model projections show fewer mid-latitude storms averaged over
each hemisphere.” (p.
751)
“There is no consistent indication at this time of discernible
changes in projected ENSO amplitude or frequency in the 21st
century.” (p.
751)
“It is
very unlikely
that the MOC will undergo a large abrupt transition during the
course of the 21st century.” (p.
752)
Contrast that
to Al Gore's
statement in
his 2006 book An Inconvenient Truth: “Our ability to live
is what is at stake.” Or James Lovelock in the Daily Telegraph
in 2006: "Billions will die…Human civilisation will be reduced
to a broken rabble ruled by brutal warlords, and the plague-ridden
remainder of the species will flee the cracked and broken earth
to the Arctic, the last temperate spot, where a few breeding
couples will survive.”
One can't help
wondering if they
are even
talking about the same planet.
Related articles:
-
Climate Change versus Climate Variability
-
Living on the Edge: The
Perils of Climate Change
-
Fighting Climate Change: Cures worse than the disease?
-
Reducing Vulnerability to Climate Change
(*) Director, Institute for Advanced
Development Studies, La Paz, Bolivia. The author happily
receives comments at the following e-mail:
landersen@inesad.edu.bo.
(1)
Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change. See
www.ipcc.ch.
Ó
Institute for Advanced Development Studies 2008.
The opinions expressed in this newsletter are those of the
author and do not necessarily coincide with those of the Institute.
If you would like to receive the Monday Morning
Development
Newsletter by e-mail, please
fill in your information here:
|